Social Security--a Ponzi Scheme?
- Share via
The contempt and disgust for American senior citizens that Hiipakka so clearly stated in his letter is a distortion of facts and highly demeaning. Most eligible retirees paid Social Security taxes for 40 quarters (10 years) at a time when wages were under $1 an hour. These taxes were a great dent in the take-home salary and not “negligible,” as defined by Hiipakka.
Social Security taxes withheld as well as the benefits derived are based on the highest income earned during the 40-quarter period. Can you imagine the number of workers who earned over $50 a week during these times? Simple computation will reveal Social Security benefits are meager and frugal when balanced against the high cost of living today.
I was raised during the Depression era and a college education was an impossible dream. Hiipakka is indeed very fortunate to have this coveted degree to open many doors to lucrative job opportunities. I highly doubt that his standard of living will be less than that of his parents, as stated in his letter.
The ME-MY-MINE tone of this letter disturbs me and implies that he alone is “supporting” a retiree, when in fact he is investing in his own retirement.
Believe me, many a senior citizen would jump at the opportunity to be gainfully employed again and erase the stigma of being a “drain on the poor working stiffs.”
How I wish it would be possible for me to again exchange views of this subject with Hiipakka 40 years from now.
ROSE MARIE ENRIGHT
Rolling Hills Estates
More to Read
Inside the business of entertainment
The Wide Shot brings you news, analysis and insights on everything from streaming wars to production — and what it all means for the future.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.