Republican Party Platform and Gays
- Share via
In this crucial election year, I am compelled to offer a few comments about my life and about the presidential election.
I have been a professional Republican most of my adult life, beginning as chair of the Sacramento County Teen-Age Republicans in 1960 to serving in the Deukmejian Administration as director of the California Arts Council. The years that I served in the Deukmejian Administration were watershed years for me. I am grateful to former Gov. George Deukmejian for giving me the opportunity to serve the people of California and for opening up my life to the arts.
I had the opportunity during those years to see the arts as a career. More importantly for me, I saw that gay people were living and working openly in the arts. During the last year in my position at the Arts Council, I accepted my sexual orientation as a gay man. Because of that my wife Nancy and I divorced after 16 years of marriage. Nancy is now, as always, my best friend and supporter. It’s a shame the Republican Party is not. I know my sexual orientation is not welcome in the Republican Party of George Bush, Dan Quayle, Pat Robertson and Pat Buchanan. The Republican Party no longer addresses the issues I care about. As we saw in Houston, issues of a woman’s right to choose; care for our global environment; a national campaign to fight AIDS; national health care; public funding for the arts; freedom of expression and gay rights were not part of the platform. I can see no reason for a gay person to be a Republican or to vote for Bush.
ROBERT H. REID
Sacramento
More to Read
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox twice per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.