Fountain Valley City Council
- Share via
Four candidates are competing in the Nov. 3 election for two seats on the Fountain Valley City Council.
Dan Hoppy
Age: 46
Occupation: Businessman
Background: Former Fountain Valley planning commissioner; former Planning Commission liaison to the city’s Committee for the Handicapped; former member of Fountain Valley Chamber of Commerce; past director of Fountain Valley Rotary Club; chairman of successful 1984 ballot initiative to limit council members to two consecutive four-year terms.
Issues: To provide new leadership; to make decisions objectively and work to improve the quality of life in the city; to carefully examine future employee pay raises when the city faces losses of state revenues.
Robert M. Hoxsie
Age: 37
Occupation: Businessman
Background: President of Boys and Girls Club of Huntington Valley; disaster coordinator for Orange County chapter of the American Red Cross; member of Orange County Children’s Theatre, Fountain Valley Historical Society and Fountain Valley Chamber of Commerce.
Issues: To support increased city efforts to deal with growing gang problems; to maintain existing city services despite a decreasing budget; to preserve the city’s small-town environment.
James D. Petrikin
Age: 52
Occupation: Businessman
Background: Current mayor. Member of Fountain Valley Chamber of Commerce, Fountain Valley Historical Society; Fountain Valley Citizen of the Year, 1983; charter commander of Veterans of Foreign Wars.
Issues: To maintain a balanced budget, without cutting services; to continue to fight crime, drugs and gangs; to continue to use the experience of the City Council to deal with county and state fiscal impacts to the city; to encourage volunteerism.
George B. Scott
Age: 59
Occupation: Businessman
Background: Incumbent council member. First elected to the council in 1969. Served from 1969 to 1978 and 1984 to the present. Board member of Boys and Girls Clubs of Huntington Valley; member of Fountain Valley Chamber of Commerce.
Issues: To attract new businesses to improve the city’s sales tax base without allowing development to disrupt the city’s small-town atmosphere; to ensure that final development of Mile Square Park will emphasize open space and passive recreation; to prevent any tax increases.
More to Read
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.