Should the Constitution Be a Required Course?

Why was “Mission to Mandate Teaching of Constitution Inserted Into Bill” (Dec. 4) buried on Page 15? How many people actually understand our Constitution? It is not very big. You can read it in an hour, and then spend a lifetime appreciating its ability to keep us free.

As Sen. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) said, “The flag is a potent symbol of our nation, but this Constitution which I hold in my hand is the soul of the nation.” We celebrate the Declaration of Independence on July 4, and those who have fought to preserve our Constitution on Memorial Day and Veterans Day. We should also take time out each year to revere this document that makes us Americans, and we must assure that our children understand its power and breadth to assure liberty and justice for all. I applaud the work of Byrd in introducing this piece of legislation.

Richard Gillock

Costa Mesa

*

It is sadly ironic that Byrd wants the federal government to force schools to teach the U.S. Constitution. Byrd says, “An informed public is our best defense against tyranny.” The founding fathers wanted to strictly limit the powers of the federal government. The Constitution limits those powers to treaties, coining money, raising an army and navy, etc. In the 10th Amendment, other powers are reserved to the states and the people. There is no authority in the Constitution for federal control over our health, education, environment, retirements and many areas. Byrd’s requirement is itself unconstitutional.

Chris Knox

Torrance

*

I think Sen. Byrd’s idea of mandating teaching of the U.S. Constitution in schools is an excellent idea. Perhaps a special class could be set up for President Bush and members of his administration who seem to be ignorant of some of the Constitution’s provisions.

Warren Dace

Los Angeles